California Fails the No Bail Test

News and Resources

California Bail Bonds

You won’t find many people, including the bondsman, who would argue that the current bail system is perfect. The desire to improve the system, however, sometimes generates some pretty extreme proposals, including the idea of ending cash bail altogether. But because such notions are often vaguely defined and fail to provide practical alternatives to bail they usually fall flat on their face.

Except in California, where a lack of fair, cost-effective alternatives hasn’t stopped the administration of Governor Jerry Brown from abolishing cash bail completely. The new law, dubbed SB 10, comes into effect in late 2019 and uses the flaws in the current system to justify chaos, discrimination and the endangering of public safety.

Replacing Bail Bonds with Something Much Worse

SB 10 initially had a lot of high powered civil society organizations behind it, including the ACLU which co-sponsored the original bill. As it wound its way through the legislative process, however, the bill became so weighed down by amendments and changes that even the ACLU eventually reversed course and announced their opposition to it.

Brown signed SB 10 anyway declaring that it would produce a system that would be fair for rich and poor alike but neglecting to address concerns that, in fact, what it was likely to do was make a bad situation even worse.

Fostering Judicial Tyranny

The final bill signed by Brown replaces the cash bail system with a “risk assessment system” (code name for “bail algorithm”) that uses artificial intelligence to try and determine if someone is a flight risk. It also assigns broad new powers to judges and prosecutors to arbitrarily detain suspects the algorithm decides likely won’t show up for their scheduled court appearance. As a result the number of people being detained is likely to skyrocket.

Why? Because bail creates an incentive for a person to appear. If they don’t, they or their indemnitor lose the full bail amount. Once this incentive to appear is removed from the system the likelihood of defendants not appearing for their court dates increases sharply. As a result judges will likely wind up detaining a higher percentage of them fearing that if they don’t they’ll simply never see those defendants again after they are released.

Codifying Institutional Racism

Its supporters claim SB 10 will eliminate the phenomenon of allegedly racist judges imposing harsh bail demands on minorities. What they fail to recognize (or maybe consciously ignore) is that a bail algorithm is only as good as its programming and the data it bases its conclusions on.

If the justice system is and has been as slanted against minorities as many believe then the statistics the bail algorithm is going to be using are by nature, racist. Therefore the entire “risk assessment system” must itself be racist. Not by intention, but because it is using racist information to draw its conclusions.

For example: It is likely any bail algorithm is going to take the incarceration history of the defendant into consideration. Historically however, a case can be made that blacks are incarcerated at a much higher rate than whites, due at least in part to being more aggressively policed.

The bail algorithm doesn’t consider over-policing as a potential cause of more frequent incarceration though. All it sees is that this person spent more time in jail. As a result it may recommend continued incarceration.

A Lack of Accountability

Another equally serious potential flaw with the bail algorithm is the lack of accountability. If a judge makes an overtly racist bail decision that decision is in the public record and the judge can be held to account.

On the other hand no one but the programmers who wrote it knows exactly how a bail algorithm works. We all just have to trust that they got things right and didn’t program in their own prejudices.

Furthermore, because development of this type of program is typically farmed out to private companies there is virtually no public oversight involved in its creation. Again, we just have to trust that the company did it right.

Finally, the bail algorithm allows judges to lock people up without having to accept responsibility. They can say they were simply acting on the recommendation of the algorithm. An algorithm no one understands and which was developed in secret by a private company.

Danger to the Defendants

Whether we like to admit it or not defendants are innocent until proven guilty and jails are often violent, dangerous places. By foregoing the bail bonding process it is inevitable that a large number of innocent people who might have been able to make bail are going to be subjected instead to the horrors of the jail system simply because a computer program says so.

Either that or judges, hemmed in by the black and white nature of “release or detain”, are going to send people to jail while they await trial just because they don’t see the option of releasing them on their own recognizance as an appropriate thing to do.


The job of the bondsman is a thankless one that some people have been trying to do away with for years. But while the current system isn’t perfect the alternatives - especially the total elimination of bail - go so far in the opposite direction that they may completely upend the rights of the accused. We don’t have bail algorithms in Jefferson County, Arapahoe County or Denver County . Yet. But don’t be surprised if they find their way here in the near future.

Next Post Previous Post

Search The Site

Speak With the Experts

Feel free to browse our bail bonds resources here or use the search above to see if we've written about the topic yet.

For the fastest response, please give us a call at (303) 623-0399 and a member of our team will be able to quickly and accurately provide an answer to any Colorado bail bond-related question you may have.

Recent Articles

Monday, September 25, 2023 Mike Tayler
Anytime you bail out a friend or loved one you’re taking a chance. If the accused heads for the hills after being released and is never heard from again you are going to lose and lose big. If you paid cash instead of using a bondsman that cash will be forfeited. If you posted a property bond the court may foreclose on your house and sell it to get the bail amount, and if you enlisted the help of a bail bonds agent they are going to come knockin...
Saturday, November 19, 2022
When a person has been arrested there’s a lot going through their mind and it can sometimes be difficult to take a step back, take a breath and make sound decisions. One mistake a lot of people who have been arrested in Denver County, Golden, and elsewhere in Colorado make is deciding to act as their own bail bond agent by paying their own bail. Certainly, if they have the means it’s entirely legal for them to do so, but just because you can...
Monday, September 25, 2023
Although those in favor of eliminating the centuries-old bail bonds system suffered a much deserved setback last year in the Colorado state senate, that hasn’t stopped them from trying to saddle taxpayers with their backward, short-sighted ideas. In fact, as you read this lobbyists are working the corridors of power in Denver trying to get legislators behind new efforts to eliminate cash bail. In its stead they propose using a deeply flawed com...

Connect With Us


Contact Info

Tayler Made Bail Bonding is available 24 hours a day and 7 days a week.

(303) 623-0399
3595 South Teller Street
Suite 300A
Lakewood, CO 80235